From Baghdad to Abuja: America’s old script of liberation and ruin

Trump’s claims of Christian genocide in Nigeria and threat of military intervention are merely recycled justifications for domination masked as humanitarian concern.

By Abu Bilaal Abdulrazaq bn Bello bn Oare
Trump threatens US military action in Nigeria over treatment of Christians / Reuters

“The snake that offers to sing for you is only measuring how close it can strike.” 

This is an old African saying that warns against gullibility — for when a people are too eager to believe every foreign tale, they risk losing both their sense of judgment and their sovereignty. 

This, sadly, is the path Nigeria appears to be treading in the wake of US President Donald Trump’s latest pronouncement, redesignating Nigeria as a Country of Particular Concern and alleging, without a shred of credible evidence, that Christians in Nigeria are victims of a genocidal campaign. 

Trump’s baseless allegations, couched in emotive rhetoric and backed by threats of intervention, can inflame an already fragile national fabric. 

He warned that if the Nigerian government “continues to allow the killing of Christians, the USA will immediately stop all aid and assistance to Nigeria, and may very well go into that now disgraced country, ‘guns-a-blazing,’ to completely wipe out the Islamic terrorists who are committing these horrible atrocities”. 

His words threaten to deepen mistrust among communities that have, for years, struggled to heal from ethno-religious wounds. 

From Iraq to Libya, from Afghanistan to Somalia, America’s invasions have left nations in ruins — destabilised, fragmented, and worse off than before. 

Each was justified in the name of democracy, freedom, or humanitarian concern. Yet when the dust settled, the so-called liberation only birthed chaos, death, and decades of instability.

To imagine that Nigeria could fare differently under such “concern” is to ignore the loud echoes of history.

Distortion of facts to self-serve

Trump’s narrative of a “genocide against Christians” in Nigeria is a gross distortion of reality. 

The facts on the ground reveal that violence in Nigeria — whether from Boko Haram, banditry, herder-farmer conflicts or communal clashes — has claimed many Muslim lives, often in larger numbers than Christians. 

Entire Muslim communities in the North-East were decimated. 

Mosques were destroyed. Muslim scholars were assassinated. Farmers in predominantly Muslim areas could not access their lands for years. 

The Nigerian military set up countless checkpoints, and entire towns were emptied. Yet no one — least of all major Western powers — ever called it a genocide against Muslims. 

The attempt to frame Nigeria’s complex security crisis as a one-sided religious extermination is nothing but selective perception and media manipulation. 

Worse still, it risks turning Nigerians against each other, pitting faith against faith, citizen against citizen, at a time when unity and understanding are most needed.

The hypocrisy is even starker when one looks beyond Nigeria’s borders. 

As of November 3, 2025, over 68,858 people have been killed and more than 170,664 injured in Gaza, according to the Palestinian Ministry of Health in Gaza, a population of just about 2.2 million. 

Yet Trump has not declared Gaza “a country of particular concern”. 

He has not called for intervention there. Why? Because the victims are largely Muslim. The double standard is glaring, and the moral inconsistency, deafening.

If truth be told, it is America itself that has long waged a sustained campaign against predominantly Muslim nations under various guises — counter-terrorism, peacekeeping, humanitarian rescue. 

Nigeria must not become the next target of that playbook. 

We cannot afford to allow another superpower narrative to define who we are, what our conflicts mean, or how we should be governed.

Nigeria is a sovereign state. Its government has repeatedly and categorically denied any claim of genocide against Christians. 

No foreign leader, no matter how powerful or loud, has the right under international law to launch military operations within our territorial boundaries. 

To do so would be an act of aggression, plain and simple. 

In these times, Nigerians must think critically, not emotionally. The real danger is not just Trump’s rhetoric — it is our own willingness to believe it. 

For as the wise say, “When the outsider tells you your mother’s soup is tastier than yours, he is only reaching for your spoon.”

SOURCE: TRT World